Microsoft founder Bill
Gates has rejected an offer to serve as Donald Trump's
science advisor, telling the US President the role was 'not a good use of my
time'.
In a new interview,
Gates disclosed that Trump offered him the long-vacant White House science
adviser position during a conversation in the Oval Office last month.
Without explaining his
reasons, Gates said he turned down the offer and admitted he does not know if
the US President was serious.
He told health sector website Stat News: 'I mentioned, 'Hey, maybe we should have a science advisor'. He said: Did I want to be the science advisor?
'I didn't put him to the
test, whether that was a serious thing or not.
'He probably himself
didn't know if he was serious. It was a friendly thing. He was being friendly.'
Gates said he told the President the role was 'not a good use of my time'.
Trump has taken longer
than any other modern president to fill the science adviser position, which has
remained vacant since the departure of John Holdren, who left at the end of the
Obama administration in January 2017.
The White House's de
facto senior science adviser is 31-year-old Michael Kratsios, a political
scientist with no formal scientific training.
While Gates is not a scientist by trade, he co-runs the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which directs a wealth of climate and infectious disease research.
Last month it was
revealed the philanthropist was backing a start-up that plans to provide 'live
and unfiltered' high definition footage of Earth from space.
The company, EarthNow,
says it will launch 500 satellites to cover Earth's atmosphere in real-time
video surveillance.
As well as Gates, SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son and aerospace giant Airbus have also backed the project.
The price of the project
could run to $1 billion (£700m).
Potential applications
include tracking illegal fishing, monitoring the weather and tracking natural
migrations globally.
Gates has previously
said improved surveillance is vital to monitor malaria-carrying mosquitoes
in vulnerable nations.

No comments:
Post a Comment